Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-07-12 23:30:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D6602F91F0E36E0C5230FB766CF1529E6FB5FC677DCB17B715875A16E39AD7A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Birdwatchers, you are not legal scholars. Don't just link to a statute. Cite a source showing it applies here. If nobody reputable is explicitly saying so, maybe there's a reason. (Hint: in this example, it's hard to influence a judge on a case that's already decided.)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1546987408771760128
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D6602F91F0E36E0C5230FB766CF1529E6FB5FC677DCB17B715875A16E39AD7A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1657668644312
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1546987408771760128D6602F91F0E36E0C5230FB766CF1529E6FB5FC677DCB17B715875A16E39AD7A4