Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-07-01 06:00:57 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B385EF974C05D1AF2067A02CE55CA6A64FEC771D6F4A0DDDDA8F8EAF709BE4E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Clarence Thomas summarized the plaintiff's argument. He did not offer his opinion on it. This headline is grossly misleading. Read his dissent directly.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1542643452386476032
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B385EF974C05D1AF2067A02CE55CA6A64FEC771D6F4A0DDDDA8F8EAF709BE4E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1656655257431
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1542643452386476032B385EF974C05D1AF2067A02CE55CA6A64FEC771D6F4A0DDDDA8F8EAF709BE4E3