Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-30 18:59:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4BBB3E29E1B79964376B61EC891CBF7BA260DEC19BCE05E736D1E07AB830765F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The comment is false as it does not have any reliable sources to back the claim from the republican party platform. It also assumes that Roe v Wade ruling was anti-women, which it was about federal versus local/state abortion law. It is a very divisive comment. https://www.history.com/topics/womens-rights/roe-v-wade

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1542497035365953536
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4BBB3E29E1B79964376B61EC891CBF7BA260DEC19BCE05E736D1E07AB830765F
  • createdAtMillis - 1656615586911
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15424970353659535364BBB3E29E1B79964376B61EC891CBF7BA260DEC19BCE05E736D1E07AB830765F