Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-28 20:00:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFD15F4DD3CC134F1DE6FCE13CE1A29B41F9F73CDEF3470B680415F8C22DF8F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-418_i425.pdf Reading the documentation of the court’s decision is blown out of per portion and should be provided as context so people can read, think, and come to their own conclusions without having to be so divisive

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541546357110054913
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFD15F4DD3CC134F1DE6FCE13CE1A29B41F9F73CDEF3470B680415F8C22DF8F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1656446458179
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1541546357110054913EFD15F4DD3CC134F1DE6FCE13CE1A29B41F9F73CDEF3470B680415F8C22DF8F7