Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-28 02:01:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46F6EB5EF2E5D4F5A272CB99574A61157A6281CD6FA9DCD76D425E27D81556A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-418_i425.pdf Reading the documentation of the court’s decision is blown out of per portion and should be provided as context so people can read, think, and come to their own conclusions without having to be so divisive

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541546357110054913
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46F6EB5EF2E5D4F5A272CB99574A61157A6281CD6FA9DCD76D425E27D81556A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1656381661690
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 154154635711005491346F6EB5EF2E5D4F5A272CB99574A61157A6281CD6FA9DCD76D425E27D81556A3