Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-28 15:59:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 08662F2493A73E12BAA79C64D261904FC91C610B9126E7A99CFEF97981A446FC
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-418_i425.pdf Reading the documentation of the court’s decision is blown out of per portion and should be provided as context so people can read, think, and come to their own conclusions without having to be so divisive

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541546357110054913
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 08662F2493A73E12BAA79C64D261904FC91C610B9126E7A99CFEF97981A446FC
  • createdAtMillis - 1656431946685
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 154154635711005491308662F2493A73E12BAA79C64D261904FC91C610B9126E7A99CFEF97981A446FC