Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-28 06:37:38 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 676CF950A5AA3D71A506A1B8806145E242FED41937B36BB7BF24046FA293E745
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court decision does not mean police are not required to inform someone of their rights before being interrogated. It only means they cannot be sued for failing to do so. Testimony given to police without being informed is presumably still not admissible in court. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-protects-police-miranda-lawsuits-2022-06-23/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541465459987316737
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 676CF950A5AA3D71A506A1B8806145E242FED41937B36BB7BF24046FA293E745
  • createdAtMillis - 1656398258826
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1541465459987316737676CF950A5AA3D71A506A1B8806145E242FED41937B36BB7BF24046FA293E745