Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-27 17:53:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 291B3C2578B0048E49B403B6068E9A21082FD60CDB3E3C2DB95A5F7AD1679BE9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court decision does not mean police are not required to inform someone of their rights before being interrogated. It only means they cannot be sued for failing to do so. Testimony given to police without being informed is presumably still not admissible in court. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-protects-police-miranda-lawsuits-2022-06-23/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541465459987316737
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 291B3C2578B0048E49B403B6068E9A21082FD60CDB3E3C2DB95A5F7AD1679BE9
  • createdAtMillis - 1656352437972
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1541465459987316737291B3C2578B0048E49B403B6068E9A21082FD60CDB3E3C2DB95A5F7AD1679BE9