Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-28 04:08:29 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 198AA89C72B4FC051E7D64C0D1A4FCF0F3620BC7F838CCE57CC59BE16C0DAFF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court decision does not mean police are not required to inform someone of their rights before being interrogated. It only means they cannot be sued for failing to do so. Testimony given to police without being informed is presumably still not admissible in court. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-protects-police-miranda-lawsuits-2022-06-23/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541465459987316737
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 198AA89C72B4FC051E7D64C0D1A4FCF0F3620BC7F838CCE57CC59BE16C0DAFF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1656389309435
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1541465459987316737198AA89C72B4FC051E7D64C0D1A4FCF0F3620BC7F838CCE57CC59BE16C0DAFF1