Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-27 18:49:51 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD5EF9C900C3E521FF7C18F86F9B023DA6958B3F2931E48499C0308F9028858B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Miranda v. Arizona remains good law, and police officers are required to provide Miranda warnings before an interrogation to obtain statements that are admissible against a defendant at trial. Vega v. Tekoh limits civil remedies, but not the suppression of statements. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-499_gfbh.pdf (pg 14)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541421229403299840
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD5EF9C900C3E521FF7C18F86F9B023DA6958B3F2931E48499C0308F9028858B
  • createdAtMillis - 1656355791889
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1541421229403299840BD5EF9C900C3E521FF7C18F86F9B023DA6958B3F2931E48499C0308F9028858B