Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-27 16:39:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9D2421A19CBCC2D538BEEFCD05506EA6A8C0DDDBDA5EF18637C1C90C86AD7B32
Participant Details

Original Note:

I’m his June 25th tweet, Cornyn is referring to landmark Supreme Court decisions that did not follow stare decisis precedent to express his agreement with the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs. It is not apparent he is advocating for a return to segregation. https://twitter.com/JohnCornyn/status/1540763079520096256?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1540763079520096256%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fd-1288538970990851114.ampproject.net%2F2206101637000%2Fframe.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541079096356179970
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9D2421A19CBCC2D538BEEFCD05506EA6A8C0DDDBDA5EF18637C1C90C86AD7B32
  • createdAtMillis - 1656347945711
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15410790963561799709D2421A19CBCC2D538BEEFCD05506EA6A8C0DDDBDA5EF18637C1C90C86AD7B32