Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-26 15:40:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6EB12AF5EFBA4D04507B5321E716831BA87742E01D7526C595B6C6C7701B87D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

I’m his June 25th tweet, Cornyn is referring to landmark Supreme Court decisions that did not follow stare decisis precedent to express his agreement with the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs. It is not apparent he is advocating for a return to segregation. https://twitter.com/JohnCornyn/status/1540763079520096256?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1540763079520096256%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fd-1288538970990851114.ampproject.net%2F2206101637000%2Fframe.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1541079096356179970
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6EB12AF5EFBA4D04507B5321E716831BA87742E01D7526C595B6C6C7701B87D9
  • createdAtMillis - 1656258029030
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15410790963561799706EB12AF5EFBA4D04507B5321E716831BA87742E01D7526C595B6C6C7701B87D9