Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-09-26 09:32:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EA9435A6C260A6F06C344A68220173B7FA77D147EEDC7915947DA578A9EF98BD
Participant Details
Original Note:
Accepting a previous ruling as the current law of the land but eventually issuing a contradictory ruling to it is not perjurious by nature. The Supreme Court Justices in question merely demured to stare decisis. https://jonathanturley.org/2022/05/04/no-conservative-justices-did-not-commit-perjury-in-confirmation-on-reversing-roe/
All Note Details