Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-10-04 02:10:52 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A5CEF14263736DED04FB0F8A1D7FC4658C72DEE3C1FFBDE70154C7FD1B3EB6EC
Participant Details
Original Note:
Accepting a previous ruling as the current law of the land but eventually issuing a contradictory ruling to it is not perjurious by nature. The Supreme Court Justices in question merely demured to stare decisis. https://jonathanturley.org/2022/05/04/no-conservative-justices-did-not-commit-perjury-in-confirmation-on-reversing-roe/
All Note Details