Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-26 08:31:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7813D9B17202FEB2A29206F1BBB064F495B8D95E9DE9E546E28727F28051C753
Participant Details
Original Note:
Accepting a previous ruling as the current law of the land but eventually issuing a contradictory ruling to it is not perjurious by nature. The Supreme Court Justices in question merely demured to stare decisis. https://jonathanturley.org/2022/05/04/no-conservative-justices-did-not-commit-perjury-in-confirmation-on-reversing-roe/
All Note Details