Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-07-03 11:39:12 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6E7C07C69B72F01DFBC1EAA70EB9ACD4C833FB0C46192D84422F17B69C5A6095
Participant Details
Original Note:
Accepting a previous ruling as the current law of the land but eventually issuing a contradictory ruling to it is not perjurious by nature. The Supreme Court Justices in question merely demured to stare decisis. https://jonathanturley.org/2022/05/04/no-conservative-justices-did-not-commit-perjury-in-confirmation-on-reversing-roe/
All Note Details