Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-08-05 18:37:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6235912DE4AF95E9F349E569C51DA1ACCC2CEB5E4F4549E150E6480A6D135A9F
Participant Details
Original Note:
Accepting a previous ruling as the current law of the land but eventually issuing a contradictory ruling to it is not perjurious by nature. The Supreme Court Justices in question merely demured to stare decisis. https://jonathanturley.org/2022/05/04/no-conservative-justices-did-not-commit-perjury-in-confirmation-on-reversing-roe/
All Note Details