Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-26 17:06:46 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5C2C263B808BE070B8435C0BDE13FC5E4EE5F3E8F22EC9C27F6E77CBD668E45
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's obvious that Cornyn is suggesting that past precedent (Plessy) CAN be overturned (Brown). People are misconstruing this intentionally as the opposite which is spreading misinformation. https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1540767433010683904

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1540796187376291842
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D5C2C263B808BE070B8435C0BDE13FC5E4EE5F3E8F22EC9C27F6E77CBD668E45
  • createdAtMillis - 1656263206893
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1540796187376291842D5C2C263B808BE070B8435C0BDE13FC5E4EE5F3E8F22EC9C27F6E77CBD668E45