Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-25 10:06:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 62478003D2FC9B2A6CB9C3B5C2EF88F34E4B1BA40722855AF2006296078CFCD0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet correctly states that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion, with the majority opinion in the Dobbs v. Jackson case, that the court should reconsider precedents including the specific cases mentioned in this tweet. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1540521801767428096
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 62478003D2FC9B2A6CB9C3B5C2EF88F34E4B1BA40722855AF2006296078CFCD0
  • createdAtMillis - 1656151581423
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 154052180176742809662478003D2FC9B2A6CB9C3B5C2EF88F34E4B1BA40722855AF2006296078CFCD0