Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-25 17:42:16 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E26FE5F7F6CBAD0A6BBE33E23863CF345B7911FC0278F4E6CA6D12357344B695
Participant Details
Original Note:
The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf
All Note Details