Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-24 18:41:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BA67E3D3248817F3E46574317C98BB1E6BB79CBF7587A2BB3C8E6900A80D4A99
Participant Details
Original Note:
The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf
All Note Details