Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-24 16:37:29 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4AFDC17D01205585E1F5DB67856BFE73FFC3EBA29068D729C6DB3E4CCD7DB089
Participant Details
Original Note:
The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf
All Note Details