Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-26 20:09:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 38FF9F0AA515FD9FCCCAB995DCF95E0F1EF99482DA9C7BDCCAB599167E5A3673
Participant Details

Original Note:

The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1540371562494164992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 38FF9F0AA515FD9FCCCAB995DCF95E0F1EF99482DA9C7BDCCAB599167E5A3673
  • createdAtMillis - 1656274155568
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 154037156249416499238FF9F0AA515FD9FCCCAB995DCF95E0F1EF99482DA9C7BDCCAB599167E5A3673