Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-24 18:44:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 05F23447B80790A71A02C9CA83A073F5458627960D2EC60BEB6CC7C8A3C7239B
Participant Details
Original Note:
The majority opinion & Thomas's concurring opinion state the decision does not cast doubt on the precedents set in the cases cited. The suggestion to reconsider past cases related to Roe is made only by Thomas. The minority opinion disagrees that past cases won't be affected https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/24/thomas-constitutional-rights-00042256 https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/supreme-court-abortion-decision/6d8d0bf51a94203d/full.pdf
All Note Details