Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-24 16:16:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 955DD22AA448C413289746A992295D0AFE89180CCF6B2ABAA46012BBAB442343
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ruling was 6-3: ALITO, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which THOMAS, GORSUCH, KAVANAUGH, and BARRETT, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., and KAVANAUGH, J., filed concurring opinions. ROBERTS, C. J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1540353236892368896
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 955DD22AA448C413289746A992295D0AFE89180CCF6B2ABAA46012BBAB442343
  • createdAtMillis - 1656087363901
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1540353236892368896955DD22AA448C413289746A992295D0AFE89180CCF6B2ABAA46012BBAB442343