Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-25 00:44:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BF4D8038C8F4CADDD727E1141E03E8EE71101ECEAB78C0971E122FB398EBD185
Participant Details
Original Note:
In the Bruen case, SCOTUS struck down a test as onerous, creating no new rights. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/new-york-state-rifle-pistol-association-inc-v-bruen/ In Dobbs, SCOTUS has limited itself to considering only the viability question as permissible. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051721zor_6537.pdf Neither case has as broad a scope as the poster suggests.
All Note Details