Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-24 14:23:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B5D5EC18F6D7B20D1EC27EBF4A04C02D0176072396BF47817EB443EF8DF51BAB
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the Bruen case, SCOTUS struck down a test as onerous, creating no new rights. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/new-york-state-rifle-pistol-association-inc-v-bruen/ In Dobbs, SCOTUS has limited itself to considering only the viability question as permissible. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051721zor_6537.pdf Neither case has as broad a scope as the poster suggests.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1540305182411603973
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B5D5EC18F6D7B20D1EC27EBF4A04C02D0176072396BF47817EB443EF8DF51BAB
  • createdAtMillis - 1656080632299
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1540305182411603973B5D5EC18F6D7B20D1EC27EBF4A04C02D0176072396BF47817EB443EF8DF51BAB