Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-24 12:42:43 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 17DA93C9E3DB59B39F32CF12F0366E183F43B13A290DC3B32DDD026BEFC02F44
Participant Details
Original Note:
In the Bruen case, SCOTUS struck down a test as onerous, creating no new rights. https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/new-york-state-rifle-pistol-association-inc-v-bruen/ In Dobbs, SCOTUS has limited itself to considering only the viability question as permissible. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051721zor_6537.pdf Neither case has as broad a scope as the poster suggests.
All Note Details