Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-23 22:27:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45C058E27ED45C579AE616E3D7346D2F37BA94C81A912448DAE9A00BB2FF464B
Participant Details

Original Note:

After this decision, a confession is still probably not admissible in court if someone didn't know their rights. From the article: "At issue was not whether a defendant must be read his Miranda rights, but whether he can sue…if he doesn't receive the Miranda warning..." https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/23/politics/supreme-court-miranda-rights/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1540087523556241408
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45C058E27ED45C579AE616E3D7346D2F37BA94C81A912448DAE9A00BB2FF464B
  • createdAtMillis - 1656023234295
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 154008752355624140845C058E27ED45C579AE616E3D7346D2F37BA94C81A912448DAE9A00BB2FF464B