Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-10 05:33:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E885231222A8461BF54B522BCBC64818C83B0A29C3301BC9F31ABEEDCE2BE445
Participant Details

Original Note:

In Egbert v Boule, SCOTUS found the 4th amendment claims did not meet the criteria for government civil liability (Bivens Test) and declined to extend new liability to 1st amendment claims. Existing 1A & 4A protections are not impacted. Border zone is defined by 8 CFR 287 https://twitter.com/mjs_dc/status/1534536335037456386 https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bivens_actions https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/287.1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1535053483967119373
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E885231222A8461BF54B522BCBC64818C83B0A29C3301BC9F31ABEEDCE2BE445
  • createdAtMillis - 1654839188980
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1535053483967119373E885231222A8461BF54B522BCBC64818C83B0A29C3301BC9F31ABEEDCE2BE445