Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-10 01:46:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6906AE45FC0324B7342C1033B06E22BCE407CFD525E80FE5993ED55E4CF45048
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study actually does not mention re-infection at all. It specifically looks at the mortality rates following the initial infection over a 1 year time period. There is no mention in the study of any of the participants being re-infected or mortality rates for that group. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(22)00087-4/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1534987901519376384
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6906AE45FC0324B7342C1033B06E22BCE407CFD525E80FE5993ED55E4CF45048
  • createdAtMillis - 1654825616381
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15349879015193763846906AE45FC0324B7342C1033B06E22BCE407CFD525E80FE5993ED55E4CF45048