Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-24 12:51:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4657398B6D01F3E57506768FCC02D34
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rittenhouse uses Zuckerberg and Facebook interchangeably. While Section 230 of the CDA would protect Zuckerberg from liability for other users’ posts on Facebook, it would not protect him from anything he himself said or posted. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230 https://www.techdirt.com/2020/06/23/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-section-230-communications-decency-act/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1534944859819212801
  • participantId - D4657398B6D01F3E57506768FCC02D34
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1656075071808
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1534944859819212801D4657398B6D01F3E57506768FCC02D34