Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-08 21:41:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D398460E20651C15B6E61CB74E574D504B61B50D038B921541A1C06F93BC6051
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rittenhouse uses Zuckerberg and Facebook interchangeably. While Section 230 of the CDA would protect Zuckerberg from liability for other users’ posts on Facebook, it would not protect him from anything he himself said or posted. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230 https://www.techdirt.com/2020/06/23/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-section-230-communications-decency-act/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1534944859819212801
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D398460E20651C15B6E61CB74E574D504B61B50D038B921541A1C06F93BC6051
  • createdAtMillis - 1683582092432
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1534944859819212801D398460E20651C15B6E61CB74E574D504B61B50D038B921541A1C06F93BC6051