Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-19 19:44:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E53648CBAB25B877387B432F7315C9A9435D3B6ABFDBD578336FBF0AF89D0744
Participant Details

Original Note:

Many of the sources linked by the Tweet author are unreliable, expressions of opinions, rather than facts. Others are very outdated, with little to no fact-based evidence or linked studies to back them up. The tweet itself is a seeming expression of pure misogyny.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1527364463988355090
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E53648CBAB25B877387B432F7315C9A9435D3B6ABFDBD578336FBF0AF89D0744
  • createdAtMillis - 1652989461013
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1527364463988355090E53648CBAB25B877387B432F7315C9A9435D3B6ABFDBD578336FBF0AF89D0744