Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-19 05:14:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D6602F91F0E36E0C5230FB766CF1529E6FB5FC677DCB17B715875A16E39AD7A4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Reporter did not interview tool creator/owner @randfish. Used extremely limited data to draw unsupported conclusion. Details: https://sparktoro.com/blog/sparktoro-followerwonk-joint-twitter-analysis-19-42-of-active-accounts-are-fake-or-spam/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1527030788440477696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D6602F91F0E36E0C5230FB766CF1529E6FB5FC677DCB17B715875A16E39AD7A4
  • createdAtMillis - 1652937263771
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1527030788440477696D6602F91F0E36E0C5230FB766CF1529E6FB5FC677DCB17B715875A16E39AD7A4