Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-17 23:03:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0BDF79D9155FB91689E6E47F6DCA7E7F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This ad doesn’t exist and this tweet is untrue. There’s no Stefanik ad that promotes replacement theory. If there was, the author of the tweet would have linked to it. There’s nothing to link to because it never happened.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1526685505659846662
  • participantId - 0BDF79D9155FB91689E6E47F6DCA7E7F
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1652828612162
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15266855056598466620BDF79D9155FB91689E6E47F6DCA7E7F