Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-28 23:51:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7C2F400239309F9306E10E43A50B82867F801FD1EBE50901A5BDD5170A97001
Participant Details

Original Note:

Critics largely read the Alito opinion as wholly undermining the "right to privacy" on which LGBT rights cases like Obergefell and Lawrence rely and view the claims therein that the ruling will not change that as disingenuous. https://nyti.ms/3yjMwHm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1524097523018780673
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7C2F400239309F9306E10E43A50B82867F801FD1EBE50901A5BDD5170A97001
  • createdAtMillis - 1680047495854
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1524097523018780673E7C2F400239309F9306E10E43A50B82867F801FD1EBE50901A5BDD5170A97001