Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-28 17:54:25 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E8E476216F8E1306050EA0A6DEE8BE204267DD37600180FC3E68B347C8B6119
Participant Details

Original Note:

Critics largely read the Alito opinion as wholly undermining the "right to privacy" on which LGBT rights cases like Obergefell and Lawrence rely and view the claims therein that the ruling will not change that as disingenuous. https://nyti.ms/3yjMwHm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1524097523018780673
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E8E476216F8E1306050EA0A6DEE8BE204267DD37600180FC3E68B347C8B6119
  • createdAtMillis - 1680026065793
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15240975230187806739E8E476216F8E1306050EA0A6DEE8BE204267DD37600180FC3E68B347C8B6119