Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-28 03:44:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 547F0FBF3C7C6983673935E5A563F57C40B7ADA714C63F34F76A4065E9A7C776
Participant Details

Original Note:

Critics largely read the Alito opinion as wholly undermining the "right to privacy" on which LGBT rights cases like Obergefell and Lawrence rely and view the claims therein that the ruling will not change that as disingenuous. https://nyti.ms/3yjMwHm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1524097523018780673
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 547F0FBF3C7C6983673935E5A563F57C40B7ADA714C63F34F76A4065E9A7C776
  • createdAtMillis - 1679975072555
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1524097523018780673547F0FBF3C7C6983673935E5A563F57C40B7ADA714C63F34F76A4065E9A7C776