Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-07 03:19:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7CA420B201D11EEB64455A469EF251800445DFB49EA303DFFA9BB203E51420C
Participant Details

Original Note:

I don't know what leads to the conclusion that this is the case, but this is libelous and could not only ruin this woman’s career without an investigation or proof, but put her life in danger. There is nothing here to support the accusation and many theories circulate. https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/how-the-leak-might-have-happened/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1522415686034804737
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7CA420B201D11EEB64455A469EF251800445DFB49EA303DFFA9BB203E51420C
  • createdAtMillis - 1651893584666
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1522415686034804737F7CA420B201D11EEB64455A469EF251800445DFB49EA303DFFA9BB203E51420C