Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-29 03:57:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C96E75E18F4A917909E0907A9A7243381FCDD6F8B130D3D146EB7F545AE4D1FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

I don't know what leads to the conclusion that this is the case, but this is libelous and could not only ruin this woman’s career without an investigation or proof, but put her life in danger. There is nothing here to support the accusation and many theories circulate. https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/how-the-leak-might-have-happened/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1522415686034804737
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C96E75E18F4A917909E0907A9A7243381FCDD6F8B130D3D146EB7F545AE4D1FD
  • createdAtMillis - 1682740636935
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1522415686034804737C96E75E18F4A917909E0907A9A7243381FCDD6F8B130D3D146EB7F545AE4D1FD