Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 23:09:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 537B11B4FC091D84F508D88B0DB74D871AB3C685FD248976BD8BC3091636D2AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

I don't know what leads to the conclusion that this is the case, but this is libelous and could not only ruin this woman’s career without an investigation or proof, but put her life in danger. There is nothing here to support the accusation and many theories circulate. https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/how-the-leak-might-have-happened/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1522415686034804737
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 537B11B4FC091D84F508D88B0DB74D871AB3C685FD248976BD8BC3091636D2AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1682723391586
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1522415686034804737537B11B4FC091D84F508D88B0DB74D871AB3C685FD248976BD8BC3091636D2AA