Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-29 14:55:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 050FCFBE29BDDA47E8F721074005460527A5FD69ADDDF0C19D0253327788E9BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

I don't know what leads to the conclusion that this is the case, but this is libelous and could not only ruin this woman’s career without an investigation or proof, but put her life in danger. There is nothing here to support the accusation and many theories circulate. https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/how-the-leak-might-have-happened/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1522415686034804737
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 050FCFBE29BDDA47E8F721074005460527A5FD69ADDDF0C19D0253327788E9BB
  • createdAtMillis - 1682780101428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1522415686034804737050FCFBE29BDDA47E8F721074005460527A5FD69ADDDF0C19D0253327788E9BB