Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-01 15:24:16 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B41D9EF52F8CF6810D4A9D5995AB90194AC69B19AA695A5B9E1AAA330FFF828B
Participant Details

Original Note:

“And to ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right. Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/read-justice-alito-initial-abortion-opinion-overturn-roe-v-wade-pdf-00029504

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1521906236492558343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B41D9EF52F8CF6810D4A9D5995AB90194AC69B19AA695A5B9E1AAA330FFF828B
  • createdAtMillis - 1675265056935
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1521906236492558343B41D9EF52F8CF6810D4A9D5995AB90194AC69B19AA695A5B9E1AAA330FFF828B