Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-05 00:23:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D23095444BC29D080CAF39D142033045F0002EBF7E93943F80020F9781FED0BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The identity of the individual who leaked the Alito opinion is currently unknown (https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_05-03-22). This thread is entirely speculative and given the inclusion of names and photos, may constitute targeted harassment under the Twitter Rules (https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1521896192900313088
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D23095444BC29D080CAF39D142033045F0002EBF7E93943F80020F9781FED0BB
  • createdAtMillis - 1651710180034
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1521896192900313088D23095444BC29D080CAF39D142033045F0002EBF7E93943F80020F9781FED0BB