Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-04 21:12:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AA63A61443FE3327207BCF5B20F61BD8154284B04AEC5E93349B26B0ACB494EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The identity of the individual who leaked the Alito opinion is currently unknown (https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_05-03-22). This thread is entirely speculative and given the inclusion of names and photos, may constitute targeted harassment under the Twitter Rules (https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules).

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1521896192900313088
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AA63A61443FE3327207BCF5B20F61BD8154284B04AEC5E93349B26B0ACB494EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1651698776504
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1521896192900313088AA63A61443FE3327207BCF5B20F61BD8154284B04AEC5E93349B26B0ACB494EC