Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-29 14:18:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 88FAC9A3E753D41E027829616529165F38E2AA882D5165D5183A86C34DF0044A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The identity of the person who leaked the Supreme Court opinion is currently unknown. This tweet is pure speculation which may result in the identified clerk experiencing harassment. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/roe-v-wade-draft-leaker-identity-unknown

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1521891306347278337
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 88FAC9A3E753D41E027829616529165F38E2AA882D5165D5183A86C34DF0044A
  • createdAtMillis - 1682777890211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 152189130634727833788FAC9A3E753D41E027829616529165F38E2AA882D5165D5183A86C34DF0044A