Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-03 19:03:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4796C211E7A6CCEFB4F2A5F392A43E0BA16C96FC0DCEE82A5B3ED5B012683F3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The two seats on the court that made this draft ruling possible were stolen by the party which was out of power in the first case and which reversed its own reasoning in the second case. Additionally, the appointments were made by a baldly criminal President who attempted a coup.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1521323254618771461
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4796C211E7A6CCEFB4F2A5F392A43E0BA16C96FC0DCEE82A5B3ED5B012683F3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1651604595549
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15213232546187714614796C211E7A6CCEFB4F2A5F392A43E0BA16C96FC0DCEE82A5B3ED5B012683F3F