Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-03 04:48:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF747FCB77E7CE4C4009BEB9DF818801F36EF2F76F04A5F99C6BA609346C333C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Per a third party analysis tool, the @NYTimes twitter handle has an audit score of 72% real followers, which is in the normal or good range (in the green) for Twitter. https://www.twitteraudit.com/NYTimes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1520468889179725824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF747FCB77E7CE4C4009BEB9DF818801F36EF2F76F04A5F99C6BA609346C333C
  • createdAtMillis - 1651553299627
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1520468889179725824AF747FCB77E7CE4C4009BEB9DF818801F36EF2F76F04A5F99C6BA609346C333C