Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-04-20 16:46:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 955DD22AA448C413289746A992295D0AFE89180CCF6B2ABAA46012BBAB442343
Participant Details

Original Note:

In addition to the other notes on this tweet about the timing being misconstrued to be about the U.S. when this article is actually about Swiss airline EasyJet, it is notable that the 'expert' cited in this article has also been critiqued numerous times for Covid-19 alarmism: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/01/china-coronavirus-twitter/605644/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1516799935412416514
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 955DD22AA448C413289746A992295D0AFE89180CCF6B2ABAA46012BBAB442343
  • createdAtMillis - 1650473204861
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1516799935412416514955DD22AA448C413289746A992295D0AFE89180CCF6B2ABAA46012BBAB442343